St. Saviour

St. Saviour Too Fractured for Proper Pastoral Planning Council Inductions

In 1 on October 6, 2009 at 9:17 am
St. Saviour Church 10/20/09

St. Saviour Church 10/20/09

On a Friday evening, September the 25th, a group of around 16 parishioners arrived at the Parish Hall at St. Saviour to attend a Pastoral Planning Council meeting. It was the first of two meetings intended to select three parishioners for the PPC and was advertised in the St. Saviour Bulletin on September 13th. The Pastoral Planning Council is defined in the bulletin as “Formed in 2006 through the discernment process, St. Saviour’s PPC conducted one-to-one interviews with many parishioners, held two parish assemblies and drafted the parish’s pastoral plan which was submitted to the diocese and subsequently approved by the Bishop. Working with other parishioners, progress on the various objectives and goals is being made and reported to the diocese on a yearly basis. The next step in the diocesan vision is pastoral plans for the clusters of parishes. St. Saviour is in a cluster with Holy Name, Immaculate Heart of Mary, St. Francis Xavier and St. Augustine.”

Parents and Parishioners are concerned with what will become of St. Saviour Elementary School when the transition from a parish school to an academy take place. They are also deeply concerned with the unquestionable fracture of their parish, as acknowledged by both Father Murphy and the remaining members of the Pastoral Planning Council. Considering the untimely firing of St. Saviour Elementary’s Principal, the unwarranted firing of the church music director, and the fact that the new principal was on the PPC and continues to be on the council, Parents and Parishioners felt called to dedicate their time and talents to be part of this important and influential council to their parish and school. The Parents and Parishioners also recognize the key role the PPC could play in healing the troubled parish.

The Diocese sent Ellen Rhatigan to lead the September 25th meeting. By the time Miss Rhatigan arrived, any tensions that initially existed between the parishioners and Father Murphy’s staff had abated and the meeting went smoothly. The next meeting was scheduled for October 2nd, and was intended to be for those still interested in being on the PPC. This meeting would entail a discernment process to select the three parishioners most suited to be on the council as decided by Father Murphy and other members of the PPC. These Parishioners who were willing to commit their time, feeling that they had been chosen by the Holy Spirit to step forward, were surprised to receive an email from Father Murphy on October 1st saying;

Dear Parish Council Nominee,
As you’ll read, Robert Choiniere, Director of Pastoral Planning of the Diocese of Brooklyn, has decided to cancel Friday’s Night of Discernment due to the tension, divisive agendas and polarization Ellen Rhatigan experienced last Friday night.
Fr. Murphy

Attached to the email from Father Murphy was a note from Robert Choiniere, the director of Pastoral Planning Councils for the Diocese. In his letter he suggested that the procedures followed by Father Murphy were not the recommended ones and may have hampered the procedures. Robert Choiniere mentioned that perhaps people who showed up for discernment were lacking in leadership gifts, which stung people who showed up to devote themselves to this group. He suggested that the discernment could take place after a reconciliation of parishioners. Mr. Choiniere mentioned that he has never had to cancel a discernment meeting and felt that our situation was very serious.

As of yet, Parents and Parishioners are left to wonder if they will have a voice in their church. They are left to wonder if their pastor is hoping they will move to another school and parish and they are left to wonder if the Diocese will be able to resolve these painful issues. It seems pretty clear to parishioners that there should be room for everyone’s voice to be heard. As one recent protester’s sign read, “We need to be loved, not ignored.”

Can’t Get Much Weirder at Brooklyn’s St. Saviour Elementary School

In 1 on September 17, 2009 at 11:26 pm

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Click here to see article with comments

Our Story So Far:
It was only last May that parents clamored to get their children into Park Slope’s desirable St. Saviour elementary school, led for 26 years by beloved Principal James Flanagan.

Cue to the dark cloud swooping over the smiling faces . . . in the form of Pastor Daniel S. Murphy, a relative newcomer. On May 11, Fr. Murphy sent a memo to the teachers at St. Saviour informing them that Principal Flanagan was being let go as of June.

Chaos ensued. Teachers cried in the halls, parents (who had just dropped off their deposits) attempted to have a meeting with Fr. Murphy, but were refused. Letters and calls went unanswered. Parents held protest marches, prayer vigils, sent letters to the press, started St. Saviour Preservation Society and a web site, and sent letters to the Bishop and superintendent.

Fr. Murphy told the Brooklyn Eagle that the firing was in accordance with the Bishop’s long-term vision of the future. The Bishop, however, distanced himself, saying that the Pastor was totally and singly in charge of his parish, hiring and firing.

Fr. Murphy quickly appointed a new principal, parish insider Maura Lorenzen. Lorenzen, recently a well-regarded co-director at Congregation Beth Elohim’s Early Childhood Center, has said nothing since starting her new job, as protests continue to swirl around her.

According to the Eagle, accusations that Lorenzen is plotting with Fr. Murphy to hike tuition or even dump the school and rent the property to the City for use as a public charter school have been aired. (Fr. Murphy denies the latter.)

Mr. Flanagan appealed to the Diocese. He won his appeal, but apparently that carries no weight.

Our Story Today:
Now the Brooklyn Eagle reports that Fr. Murphy has turned down a mediator’s recommendation that Principal Flanagan return to St. Saviour for one more year, this time as a co-principal.

Father Murphy told the Brooklyn Eagle on Friday “that he has indeed declined to have Flanagan return as a co-principal,” but “did not elaborate on his reasons.”

Meanwhile, some parishioners are leaving St. Saviour to attend Mass at another church. Others are diverting money from the collection basket. More parent protests are planned.

Can it get any weirder? Can Fr. Murphy possibly screw the situation up any more than he has?

And about the Diocese of Brooklyn — They have the power to close a school, to combine schools into academies, to hire and fire pastors. Can they really claim they have absolutely no influence over Fr. Murphy?

As they fiddle, Rome burns.

St. Saviour Church 9/16/09

St. Saviour Church 9/16/09

Mediator’s Solution Rejected By Catholic School Pastor

In 1 on September 17, 2009 at 9:33 pm

Park Slope’s St. Saviour Torn Apart by Controversy 8/31/2009

By Mary Frost
Brooklyn Daily Eagle

PARK SLOPE — A Park Slope pastor was offered a compromise solution to a situation that has torn a Catholic elementary school apart for months – but he has rejected the offer, the Brooklyn Eagle has learned.

Pastor Daniel S. Murphy turned down a mediator’s recommendation that popular St. Saviour Elementary School principal James Flanagan return to St. Saviour for one more year, this time as a co-principal. Flanagan led St. Saviour for 26 years.

Father Murphy confirmed on Friday via email that he has indeed declined to have Flanagan return as a co-principal, but did not elaborate on his reasons.

Father Murphy fired Flanagan in May and has since appointed a new principal, pastoral parish council member Maura Lorenzen. (See earlier Brooklyn Eagle stories: Parents Still Protest as Slope Catholic School Chooses New Principal and Catholic Parents Protest Firing of Beloved Principal

Since then, devastated parents have picketed repeatedly in front of the church, have sent appeals to Bishop DiMarzio and other church officials, and collected 681 signatures on a petition. Families and friends have also formed the St. Saviour Preservation Society, with its own web site (http://stsaviours.wordpress.com/).

Denying Rumors

Fr. Murphy told the Brooklyn Eagle earlier this summer that he has “the highest regard for Ms. Lorenzen,” and is confident “she’ll do an excellent job leading the school as the new principal. She’s highly regarded in the community, she’s lived in Park Slope her whole life and is well known and well respected.”

Parents say they don’t want to trash Ms. Lorenzen, who as been praised by many for her work as co-director at Congregation Beth Elohim’s Early Childhood Center (ECC).

But parent Cindy Brolsma, who has three children attending St. Saviour, is one of many parents who feel Flanagan is being forced out because he – unlike Ms. Lorenzen – “disagreed with Fr. Murphy about raising tuition.” Brolsma says parents also worry that plans are afoot to rent the school building to the city for conversion to a non-Catholic charter school.

The St. Saviour Preservation Society is requesting that Fr. Murphy turn over minutes of meetings of the parish council reflecting Maura Lorenzen’s statements on that topic.

In June, Fr. Murphy, in a letter to parents, denied that he intended to close the school and sell the building, calling the idea “a lie.”

Diocese Has No Say

The Diocese of Brooklyn claims it has no say in the Flanagan matter. Principal Flanagan recently won his appeal to the Superintendent’s office – but was informed that the Diocese still couldn’t force the pastor to re-hire him.

Father Kieran Harrington, spokesperson for the Brooklyn Diocese, told the Eagle in June that each parish is an autonomous corporation. “We try to facilitate the process, but every decision is made at the local level. The person who makes the decisions is Father Murphy . . . He hires, he fires. He signs all the contracts for the parish. We don’t even set salaries.”

Confusion Reigns

Parents say that they are entering the new school year with fear and confusion. The issue has been largely ignored in school correspondence, said parent Cathy Inniss. “I received the standard letter for the opening of the school year this week, and from what I can tell, all that changed in the content was the name of the sender.”

Click here to read the rest of the article